New research dives into the practices both clear and inconspicuous that may put you in danger of succumbing to digital wrongdoing including Trojans, infections, and malware.
“People who show signs of low self-control are the ones we found more susceptible to malware attacks,” says Tomas Holt, professor of criminal justice at Michigan State University and lead author of the research.
“An individual’s characteristics are critical in studying how cybercrime perseveres, particularly the person’s impulsiveness and the activities that they engage in while online that have the greatest impact on their risk.”
Low self-control, Holt explains, may be the reason.
This sort of individual hints at foolishness, carelessness, physical versus verbal conduct, and a failure to postpone gratification.
“Self-control is an idea that’s been looked at heavily in criminology in terms of its connection to committing crimes,” Holt says.
“But we find a correlation between low self-control and victimization; people with this trait put themselves in situations where they are near others who are motivated to break the law.”
The exploration, which shows up in Social Science Computer Review, evaluated the poise of almost 6,000 study members, and additionally their PCs’ conduct that could demonstrate malware and disease.
To gauge exploitation, Holt and his group solicited members an arrangement from inquiries concerning how they may respond in specific circumstances.
For PC conduct, they got some information about their PC having slower handling, smashing, unforeseen pop-ups, and the landing page changing on their internet browser.
“The internet has omnipresent risks,” Holt says.
“In an online space, there is constant opportunity for people with low self-control to get what they want, whether that is pirated movies or deals on consumer goods.”
What people do online matters, and the behavioral variables at play are completely linked to risks.
As Holt explains, hackers and cyber criminals know that people with low self-control would be the ones who are scouring the web for what they want-or believe they want-which is the way they know what websites, files, or methods to assault.
Knowing the psychological side of self-control and the forms of individuals whose computers become infected with malware-and who probably spread it into others-is crucial in combating cybercrime, Holt says.
Holt says, approach malware prevention and instruction from a technical standpoint; they search for new software solutions to prevent messaging or infections about the infections themselves.
This is important, but it is also vital to address the emotional side of messaging to those with low self-control and spontaneous behaviors.
“There are human aspects of cybercrime that we don’t touch because we focus on the technical side to fix it,” he says.
“But if we can understand the human side, we might find solutions that are more effective for policy and intervention.”
Looking ahead, Holt hopes to help break the silos between computer and social sciences to think holistically about fighting cybercrime.
“If we can identify risk factors, we can work in tandem with technical fields to develop strategies that then reduce the risk factors for infection,” Holt says.
“It’s a pernicious issue we’re facing, so if we can attack from both fronts, we can pinpoint the risk factors and technical strategies to find solutions that improve protection for everyone.”